Todd Bentley: God's agenda for Lakeland: not about Jesus... BAM! goes the Word... (watch videos on YouTube)
The following sounds like the same time of ability to stretch truth to fit an agenda that so many swallow in the name of prosperous destiny. However, this time, the price required is not money currency, but "sight".
I don't know what attitude I'm supposed to have, but i know which one i have.
andre
I'VE CHANGED my MIND ABOUT LAKELAND" - Ken [-Revivalschool member].
Well, shortly after Lakeland started I was posting here as a "supporter". I had my life transformed in the Brownsville revival, and knowing that many who were offended at Lakeland were from the same camp as those who opposed Brownsville, I naturally took what I thought to be "the proper side". Although I did say I was put off by the hype surrounding Lakeland, I was open to the idea that it was "from God", and I saw criticism from this board that I chalked up to mostly phariseeism.
Then a couple of weeks ago I saw this video on YouTube. [-Linked
below]. It changed my mind once and for all. I don't know what spirit
was speaking to Bentley when he was told the revival wasn't about
getting people to Jesus, but it's about getting people to believe in
"the angel", but I've enough discernment to know it wasn't God's Spirit!
This
should be elementary, but since sharing this with others I know who've
supported Lakeland, I was shocked to find it really didn't bother them
in the least! The leader of the revival says it's not about getting
people to Jesus but getting them to believe in "the angel"- SINGULAR.
What the heck? Is this the delusion?
Well, I've seen the devil
tip his hand and I've turned the other direction. If God allowed me to
see it and turn, He'll show others too. I'm praying it happens, and I'm
telling everyone I know about this.
I apologise to anybody I
might have offended or misled in keeping my "open mind" about Lakeland.
I would exhort everyone who still thinks this is "from God" to honestly
listen to what's being said on the video. Does the Holy Spirit lead
people to Jesus, or angels?
(and there are a few more on YouTube about the same topic - andre)
------------- MORE from KEN: Todd said that "God" told him
"Todd, you've got to get the people to believe in the angel." I don't
know how else to take that. I don't have a problem with believing in
the supernatural, if I didn't believe in the supernatural I wouldn't
believe in Jesus in the first place!
But look at the statement
again. It looks like an agenda to me. Todd and the rest (Bob Jones,
etc.) are always talking about their encounters with supernatural
entities, but you never once hear how they test what they're supposedly
communicating with. I've even heard BJ say that he told a "priest" that
was talking to him, "I know that you're Jesus, but I don't know who".
So
who, or what are these spirits that are talking to these guys? They
aren't tested, and nobody from the prophetic movement seems to think
it's important that they are. The "credentials" of the preacher passing
on the message are good enough (Credentials meaning, how many people do
they have following their ministry). Well, that's not the criteria I
read in the Bible for testing the spirits.....
So my point is,
the spirits aren't tested, so all you have to go by is does what they
say agree with the Spirit and the Word? Would it be on God's agenda to
get people to believe in "The angel" ? Why? Was that a running theme in
the New Testament church? Was Paul bent on getting the "gospel of the
angel" to the church at large, or to any of his mission field? I have
to say no, it is and always has been and never will be anything other
than getting the people to JESUS. If things aren't going "that
direction", count me out - I ain't goin', and I'll tell anyone else
who'll listen they should skip the trip, too...
In the
context of that message Todd was talking about "the angel of the winds
of change", who Todd says is responsible for the revival. Why is an
angel responsible for the revival? Why wouldn't God Himself be
responsible? What angelic entity that was of the host of the Lord would
even allow a "move of God" to focus on itself? I can think of only one
type of angel that would receive any kind of special attention or glory
from men - that would be a fallen angel.
Let the Spirit of the Lord speak to your heart concerning these things.
I pray you find the true God and Lord of the Bible and follow Him only.
~Read more discussion of this topic on the Forum at- http://www.revivalschool.com
The following comments are owned by whomever posted them. This site is not responsible for what they say.
I'VE CHANGED my MIND ABOUT LAKELAND"
Authored by: The Last Spike on
Friday, July 04 2008 @ 10:19 AM CST
Welcome back Ken :- ) (Figuratively & Literally)
". . .Todd was talking about "the angel of the winds
of change", who Todd says is responsible for the revival." Sounds to me to be the prince of the air.
Authored by: processthis on
Friday, July 04 2008 @ 07:30 PM CST
The presentation of this above comment may be confusing, and I apologize. I received this from a mailing list I'm subscribed to. The Ken in question is also a member of that list, and has been posting pro-Lakeland posts for weeks. This is his personal turn-around story.
Also, Todd Bentley didn't say "BAM! goes the Word!" but I did, expressing that he's pushing the Word out of the picture and obviously preaching a strange gospel. The rest from Ken is all his, except where noted.
The reason I sent this to Tim (thanks for posting it!) is that the "prophetic" flavor of TMC is heading the same way, they love Todd and broadcast his show. Discernment has not been a strong force at TMC, and that's not a mystery. But their determination to retain the weird stuff is a wonder to behold. God might just let them choke on it, unless there is evident repentance and fruit following. Being on the edge of thing for the sake of being on the edge, that's not following the Spirit.
I think the "flash flood" that hit Lethbridge on July 1st was a bit of a warning that the time is short... judgment can happen in an instant, unannounced.
Blessings, and may the grace of sight be given to those who need it,
Authored by: The Last Spike on
Friday, July 04 2008 @ 09:42 PM CST
No confusion Andre; it was evident by your presentation of the letter that you were re-posting the words of another. I welcome him back to reality, whether he ever reads this or not. Concerning the MC loving Bentley . . . Bentley first appeared at the MC near 3 years ago. I believe he's spoken there 3 times to date. The MC is totally bought into him and his angels. Here is another Blog concerning Bentley you may find interesting
Authored by: Spidey on
Monday, July 14 2008 @ 04:35 PM CST
Here is a link to an interesting "Theological Response" to Lakeland by Dr. Gary S. Greig, PhD., a former Associate Professor of Old Testament and Hebrew at Regent University School of Divinity, and Senior Editor, Theology and Acquisitions for the Regal Publishing Group: http://www.freshfire.ca/UserFiles/File/drGreg_biblicalperspective2008.pdf
Authored by: marina on
Thursday, July 17 2008 @ 10:19 AM CST
Here is a link to a theological counter response to Gary Greig's argument for Lakeland by Jacob Prasch of Moriel Ministries. I wouldn't put a lot of stock in what is written by anyone who hails from a university founded by current chancellor, Pat Robertson.
Authored by: Spidey on
Tuesday, July 15 2008 @ 07:48 PM CST
Criticism about revival is nothing new. Back in the 1700s, Jonathan Edwards, who led the U.S. into the Great Awakening, received considerable objections from his Puritan brothers. Here is his take on the subject (taken from Mike Bickle's book "Growing In The Prophetic") ...
Edwards noted that all kinds of rather bizarre and strange manifestations or methods were used of God in the Bible and that simply because something was odd certainly did not disqualify it from being of God. He referred to 5 tests to determine if a particular manifestation was to be regarded as a true work of the Holy Spirit. Edwards stated that Satan cannot and would not, if he could, generate the following kinds of things in people. He said, "If we can answer 'yes' to one or more of these questions, then it is to be regarded as genuine despite any little objections and criticisms that people make about the oddities, irregularities, errors in conduct, and the delusions and scandals of some believers."
In other words, Edwards was saying that the presence of some human mixture does not, in general, invalidate the divine stamp upon any work within a revival. The presence of considerable human elements in and around a spiritual revival should always be expected. Here are the 5 tests:
Does it bring honor to the person of Jesus Christ?
Does it produce a greater hatred of sin and a greater love for righteousness?
Does it produce a greater regard for Scripture?
Does it lead people into truth?
Does it produce a greater love for God and man?
From my understanding of the fruit of the Lakeland Revival, I would say that the answer to all 5 questions is a resounding "YES".
I thought the Bible made it clear about false prophets and how deadly lies mixed with truth are to believers. Spidey, based on your comment, you're saying the end justifies the means. Didn't I read somewhere about making people twice the sons of hell?
Though you describe the scenario surrounding Jonathan Edwards, I must ask, was he ever caught in a lie? Though many may not have agreed with him, did he use false testimony or fabrications to validate his preaching the way Bentley does? I haven't got the time or desire to research this but I'd be willing to bet his only downfall was that the ultra-conservatives didn't like his liberality and willingness to challenge their beliefs.
For me, I'll just continue to love the truth and hate the lies. As far as the liars go, they can all burn in hell. After all, that is the promise of Jesus, isn't it?
Authored by: Spidey on
Thursday, July 17 2008 @ 07:39 PM CST
The 5 criteria are talking about what is the fruit of the "revival." Does the revival 1) bring honour to the person of Jesus, etc. Obviously I'm not, and I'm sure Todd Bentley and the others in Lakeland, wouldn't suggest that "anything goes." As far as what the clip shows, who really knows what went on there? Todd himself is probably not the one who is going to be going around doing the legwork to verify everything that comes in. Was this handed off to another person who didn't do their job but then assured Todd that it was verified? Who knows? Regardless, this incident doesn't negate the work that God is doing in the lives of thousands of people in Lakeland. You certainly can't back up your suggestion that Todd is purposely using false testimony or fabrications to validate his teaching. I would hope he's learned a lesson and is more careful regarding claiming 100% verification of testimonies, but, like I said, that doesn't negate God's work in the revival.
I have no false thoughts that I or anyone else is going to change your mind on whether or not Lakeland is a true revival, nor do I wish to. You can believe what you want. But I think it's truly sad that you're so critical of what has been resulting in tremendous fruit in the lives of literally thousands and thousands of people.
Authored by: marina on
Thursday, August 14 2008 @ 11:08 AM CST
How's this for the fruits of a "True Revival": Todd Bentley has filed for marital separation despite months of marriage counseling! He claims to have resurrected over 30 people from the dead by the power of God, but is unable to keep his own family together. Go figure.
It's curious that this announcement comes during his "time to rest and refresh" away from the revival (sound familiar Dick and Joan?), which of course he took shortly after his expose on ABC Nightline. Could the truth about Bentley and Co.'s little revival hoax and healing claims with no documented evidence, after being exposed for all the world to see, been the last straw for his wife? God only knows what she knows about what goes on behind the scenes...Perhaps her conscience, because she actually has one, was interfering in her husband's career.
Authored by: Howie51 on
Friday, August 15 2008 @ 08:50 AM CST
Todd will forever have a following - seems that disclosure of outright sin, disobedience, witchcraft, even assault , martial problems (and just plain stupidity) aren't sufficient evidence for many who are still accepting what the "prophet and man of God" has to say. After all, he is the one on stage with the microphone, therefore God must have put him there - and after all "touch not mine anointed" and "do not judge". This sort of stuff happens because the man with the microphone has duped folks into believing the scriptures actually say this. (There is a wealth of teaching on this site to the contrary).
After reading the limp excuses on various blogs as to why many insist on defending Todd, they now get a kick in the gut, like the fellow with stage 4 colon cancer who Todd (stupidly) assaulted. The list is endless – do folks now see the light? What does it take for believers these days to discern a false prophet? How blatant does it have to be? I could put my cat on stage and lip sync him with Robert Tilton, and someone, somewhere would insist was annointed of God. Okay, thats a little rash, but I'm making a point.
We had better learn to touch and to judge, so go ahead - believe in Todd, and follow him if you must. As for me and my house, we will follow the Lord.
Authored by: The Last Spike on
Monday, August 18 2008 @ 06:19 PM CST
Bentley was a fool in Abbotsford, back in 1998, and he is still a fool today. I would like to knee him in the groin, as I feel anointed to lay hands on him (LOL)!
I like the idea about your cat! Let's do this thing! Put an animal on stage and lip-synch the dialogue. We'll carry it on till we see revival and then expose the hoax to the mindless sheep. I think that is what is needed to open up their eyes. Two years ago we did something similar at Dominion Conference (sprinkled gold and silver coloured glitter and planted plastic gem stones throughout the conference hall) waited for the fall-out (reaction), and then exposed the charade here on this site. People claiming to have gotten gold dust or found gem stones at the conference soon shut up their silly little stories of make-believe (wanna-believe) when they were finally faced with the undeniable reality they had been duped. (HAH!)
I really think the whole talking *censored*-cat (messenger of God) thingy 's time has arrived. I'd love to perpetrate this (LOL)
Too funny! As for Bentley he is a stooge and a buffoon. The sooner we stop talking about that loser the better.
Welcome back Ken :- ) (Figuratively & Literally)
". . .Todd was talking about "the angel of the winds of change", who Todd says is responsible for the revival." Sounds to me to be the prince of the air.